The Holocaust Isolationism and Antisemitism - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1328 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/04/26 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Holocaust Essay Did you like this example? The Holocaust is one of the most horrendous and brutal events to happen in world history. It was a period of mass destruction forced upon European Jews by the Nazis of Germany between the years of 1933 when Hitler comes into power until 1945 where hes defeated. Numerous tragedies of the Holocaust led to broken homes and families that people are still affected by. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Holocaust: Isolationism and Antisemitism" essay for you Create order As 19th century Germans adopted Christianity and antisemitism, the demand for national and racial superiority became high. Hitler deemed the Germans as Aryan people (a pure master race characterized by blond hair, blue eyes, and a tall stature worthy of more respect than that of God himself). At last, the idea was born that Jews would be depicted as an insignificant race of foreigners, killers of Christ, and the cause of all economic and political misfortune. And so meditated genocide begun. Although Jews suffered primarily throughout this event, other parts of society were left with lasting effects. Not only were the Nazis attempting to ravage Jewish people, but there were efforts made to destroy the Romans and Polish also. Jews would seek refuge in these areas of Europe as they escaped Hitlers camps. The Holocaust is still very relevant today. Descendants of these groups of people may feel the impact of the ghastly count of genocide the world may have ever faced. The Holocaust is a part of history that brings light to the gruesome acts of hate and racism the world currently experiences. Often being compared to terrorism and civil rights movements in America. The Holocaust prevailed, isolationism, and antisemitism. Investigative questions have arisen on Americas response to the Holocaust around the United States knowledge of this event and how they reacted. In spite of historical data supporting evidence of accommodating Holocaust victims, the United States crippled with issues of their own during the 1930s made satisfying greater expectations difficult. Options to respond to the persecution of Jews presented themselves to the United States a number of times throughout the history of the Holocaust. The refugee crisis of 1939 and the deportation of Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz-Birkenau are a few of these times. In 1939, Jews from Hamburg, Germany, set sail on a ship called the St Louis to Havana, Cuba to pursue refuge only to find out their landing permits were invalidated by a Cuban law before the arrival of the ship. After nearly every passenger was dismissed of entering, the ship sailed to Florida with hopes of entry through a US port. Because of the depression and increase of anti-Semitism, the Roosevelt administration saw political danger in American policies regarding open immigration to the United States, making it very challenging for foreigners to enter. The ship was refused once again upon entry to Florida forcing the passengers to return to Europe. Later, the United States received a report from the World Jewish Congress of the Germans plan to exterminate European Jews proposing American officials to bomb Auschwitz where the Jews were being deported from Hungary. The United States indicated numerous reasons for the denial of the proposal. Reasons being they didnt want to divert military resources from war efforts against Germany and bombing may in rage more malicious action from the Germans. Heavily motivated by the Great Depression, anti-semitism justifies Americas stringent mindset of refusing Jewish refugees to enter American land. Furthermore, in hindsight, refusing to assist in Auschwitz would help to reinforce their intent to keep Jews from entering. As Adolf Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany he soon prepared to organize policies to segregate German Jews forcing upon them ostracism, persecution and murder. Anti-semitism demanded a boycott of Jewish businesses, restricted education, and dismissed Jews from Civil service prohibiting them from being able to make a living as professionals. The writings of Jewish authors were burned. German businesses later announced their refusal to service Jews. Laws were passed that only allowed Aryans to become German citizens. Marriage and extramarital intercourse became illegal for Aryans and Jews to participate in together. The repressive nonviolent acts later turned violent and fatal when Nazi riots (Kristallnacht) destroyed hundreds of Jewish synagogues, schools, businesses, schools, and hospitals. Many Jews were murdered in a result of the violence. Police officers and firemen were ordered to halt their assistance except to extinguish burning building only on Aryan owned property. American responses were informed by Roosevelts acknowledgment of Kristallnacht. His statement to the media announced the progression of anti-Semitism in Germany. Although he disapproved of the violence brought on by Nazis, this major event wasnt enough to slacken the immigration rules that hindered multitudes of Jews from pursuing safety in the United States. Reason being that they wanted to decrease the possibility of Nazi spies settling in the US and because of the anti- Semitic ideas of the elite officials in the United States State Department. Some American societies put forth astringent actions against Germany. The anti-Nazi Boycott gave troubled Americans an option to assist the Jews with the events happening in Germany. The American Jewish Congress and Jewish Labor Committee regarded the boycott of German goods as an explicit way to set back German pursuits. Additionally, the executive secretary of the Non- Sectarian Anti- Nazi League issued a letter to college and university students warning them to avoid importations from Germany at the supply house. Unfortunately, these efforts never externalized a strong, secure boycott of German goods. Participation around the 1936 Berlin Olympics brought forth yet another boycott against the Germans. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) received a formal promise by Nazis that Jews and non-Aryan athletes would be granted access to equally train and compete with others. Some Americans and Europeans began to advocate an Olympic boycott after the discovering reports of discrimination of the Jewish athletes however.. The Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) postponed the acceptance of their invitation to participate in the Olympics until an investigation was put forth regarding German prejudices Jewish Athletes. Catholic organizations and labor unions who had the support of the New York Times were involved in the boycott as well. Walter white head, who was the head of the NAACP in 1935, sent a request to the AAU to refuse participation in the Berlin Olympics assuming the black athletes and other nonwhite races may receive the same discriminatory actions as the Jews. The American team did enter the Olympics after all. A small number of Jews and African American athletes participated. The African American athletes especially seeing an opportunity to prove themselves. There were segments of American society who urged the US government to essentially close the doors to refugees. The immigration quotas set by the US Congress were considerably limited which prevented undesirable groups of people access to the united states. American officials arranged for the US Coast Gaurd to refuse the St Louis ship to enter into the United States after the ship was refused in Cuba. The Roosevelt administration assumed it was a better decision to stay silent during Kristallnacht as not to provoke German spies from entering into the US. In my opinion, during the Holocuast, America could have done more to assist the Jews seeking refuge in the United States. The long drawn out processes needed to approve the refugees only contributed to more Jews being murdered. Somehow, I understand somewhat of why certain groups were reluctant to be more helpful. The United States had to consider their part in the war with Germany and protecting their own people with job security after the Great Depression before they could examine options to let more people in. Regardless, more effort could have been made in how fast the decisions were made. The Holocaust is one of the most horrendous and brutal events to happen in world history. Isolationism and antisemitism remained at the heart of the Holocaust. No matter what information slipped through to the United States from outside sources, The United States held their ground on their strict immigration policies throughout the life of the events of the Holocaust.

Oedipous Rex vs. the Odyssey Essay - 1168 Words

Heroism and Hell Oedipus and Odysseus are two of many widely recognized characters known for their outstanding, and, at times, tragic stories. The Odyssey, by Homer, is an Epic poem about the great journey of Odysseus and his perilous journey home to Ithaca. Oedipus the King, by Sophocles, is a Greek play about Oedipus’ self-discovery and fulfillment of a prophecy in which he hopes to avoid. While the stories share many similarities and qualities, they also reveal significant differences in their journeys and outcome. Oedipus and Odysseus share many similarities; they are both respected leaders and known for great triumphs. Throughout the story of Oedipus, we learn that he is a great king of Thebes. He has promised the†¦show more content†¦Similarly, Odysseus begins his tale explaining how his journey is to return home. Having finished fighting in the Trojan war he begins journeying home when he is held captive by Calypso, a nymph for a number of years. Odysseus faces many obstacl es and problems trying to reach Ithaca, â€Å"...the voyage fraught with hardship...homeward bound from Troy...† (ll 43-44, p357). Not only was he captured by Calypso, but he face troubles with the Lotus-eaters, the Sirens, the cyclops and much more. Coupled with the constant setbacks, Odysseus must also deal with suitors that have taken over his palace. Oedipus and Odysseus are both faced with large underlying conflict in addition to the significant presence and influence of the Greek Gods. The Greek Gods have a large influence in both the stories of Oedipus the King and The Odyssey. At the beginning of Oedipus’ journey, the god Apollo has brought a curse upon Thebes and wants it rid of Laius’ murderer, â€Å"what I heard, from the God King Phoebus in plain words commanded us to drive out a pollution from our land† (ll 108-109, p 621). Oedipus and the citizens of Thebes are highly concerned with the wrath of the Gods. Odysseus shares similar concerns. Od ysseus articulates every obstacle of his journey- each one with a reference or direct influence of a god â€Å"What pains- the gods have given me my share† (ll 16, p 37) . When Odysseus blinds

Health and Safety Measures Management

Question: Write an essay on Health and Safety Measures In Organizations? Answer: Introduction Employees of an organization just like other resources need care and maintenance so as to maximize their productivity and improve performance. Human resource managers are thus these days faced with crucial issues of occupational health and safety than before. Creating a workplace that attracts, maintains and motivates The workforce is thus one of the biggest and modern challenges that organizations are facing today. This calls for the management team to explore new ways of countering this problem by instituting drastic, accurate and up-to-date mechanisms that will make the workplace environment exciting; a workplace environment where people enjoy what they do, reveal a purposes of work and give them a reason to be proud working and enabling them to reach their potential (Nowier, 2009). America has an occupational safety and health Act 1970 which is supplemented by the National Institute for Occupational health and safety. Furthermore, governments in most countries have become committed to occupational safety and health aspects thus making it a policy issue. Occupational, health and safety issues are based in the Ministry of Labor, Department of Occupational Health and Safety. Studies conducted in the past, for instance, Hughes (2007) surveyed 2000 employees pertaining to various organizations and industries in multiple levels. The reported results of these surveys showed that nine out of ten affects the attitude of employees and increases their productivity (Nowier, 2009). Employees feel motivated and 'valued by their employers when their needs are comprehensively taken care of. The motivation and employee satisfaction are a major contribution to employee productivity hence improved organizational performance since there is a reduction in cost associated with injuries, absenteeism, accidents and court cases due to failure to comply with occupational health and safety regulations. Previous research studies have shown that about 4.7 million non-fatal injuries and illnesses occur at work annually (Mathis and Jackson, 2006). Injuries are prone in every occupations and matters of safety are treated differently by both the employer and employees. The building surveyor provides services that are sensitive to safety and health of employees and thus the challenge it faces is based on providing a safe and health work environment in order to motivate staff and hence improve their performance. Safety training and safety policy are also essential determinants to enhance safety performance. Effective training assists employees to have a sense of belonging and thus, is more accountable for safety in their workplace. Literature review This aimed to highlights the theoretical review of occupational safety and health standards, the role that organizations play in enhancing workplace safety and health and the various strategies developed by several authors. Previous studies have demonstrated that effective safety management improves level of safety in organizations. Thus, it can be seen to decrease damages and harm from incidents (Bottani, Monica Vignali, 2009). Commitment to safety management, communication safety, health and safety objectives, training needs, rewarding performance and worker involvement are some common themes of safety management practices noted by Mearns et al. 2003. They also maintained the associations between safety management, safety climate, and safety culture. Overall safety culture is considered to be indicated by safety climates, while safety management practices display safety culture of top management. The result is a good safety management practices are reflected in enhanced safety climate of all employees. Commitment of management determines the level of the positive and supportive safety attitudes portrayed by the employers to the employees. From a prior study, Yule: Bin and Murdy (2007), claimed there has been a reduction in accidents from the dedication to the safety management. The study conducted in the construction industry in 2001 by the Occupational Safety and Health Council of Hong Kong found out that the attitude of senior management towards safety culture was positive. The level of positive response fell from the senior managers, supervisors to the front line workers. The study based on the fact that the construction industry is the most hazardous industries in Hong Kong, proposed that its safety culture be strong. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) OSHA is a federal law from the Occupational Safety and Health Act established in 1970.It was designed to make the workplace safer by ensuring that the work environment is free from hazards. It was created within the Department of labor, and it is mostly concerned with administering the act and to set and enforce the safety and health standards that apply to most workers in the United States. OSHA Act mandates numerous safety standards and enforces these standards through a system of inspections, citations, and fines. OSHA requires that employers should provide a safe and healthy work environment. This calls for the compliance with specific occupational safety and health standards and keep records of occupational injuries and health. Occupational diseases were being reported every year. To ensure that each employer complies by the health and safety standards, OSHA imposed three major obligations on employers: To provide a safe and healthy work environment, complying with specific occu pational safety and health standards and keeping records of occupational injuries and illnesses. Canwell (2004), state that in most large organizations, all health and safety issues are mainly coordinated by a particular officer, who is concerned with the maintenance of a safe working environment and safe working practices. Employers should thus provide an employment place that is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. It is a requirement by law that businesses should ensure that their employees' health is not compromised as the result of their work (Sutherland and Canwell, 2004). All the employees should be made aware of the existence of the safety and health policy by issuing a safety policy document to all employees or through a company handbook that has details of the policy. Mathis and Jackson (2007) came up with three approaches to be used in managing safety and health. The first approach is organizational approach consisting of designing jobs, developing and implementing safety policies, using safety committees and coordinating accident investigations. The second is the engineering approach: Designing work settings and equipment, reviewing equipment and applying ergonomic principles. The third approach is the individual involves reinforcing safety motivation and attitudes, providing employee safety training and rewarding safety through incentive programs. Conclusions Economic arguments aimed at promoting business efficiency through effective management. Legal argument showed the responsibilities of both the employee and the employer. Moral and ethical argument portrayed the importance of having the safety an employee protected. The costs of accidents and illness can be immense, but the good news is that there is evidence that the regulations, penalties and increased awareness brought about by OSHA have improved workplace safety and health significantly. The major role that organization should to play is in enhancing a workplace health and safety environment. The management and employees should actively participate in enhancing a conducive working environment through effective implementation of OSH regulations to enhance employee productivity. Organizations should train their staff on health and safety issues, regularly inspect the workplace and provide a health policy for guidance. Organizations that adhere to OSHA standards are bound to be at a competitive advantage over the long-run. References Analoui F., 2007, Strategic Human Resource Management. Thomson Learning, UK. Bottani, E., Monica, L. Vignali, G., 2009, Safety Management Systems: Performance Differences Between Adopters and Non-adopters: Safety Science, vol. 47, pp. 155- 162. Carder, B. Ragan, P.W., 2003, A Survey-Based System for Safety Measurement and Improvement: Journal of Safety Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 157- 165. Hughes, 1., 2007, Office Design in Pivotal to Employee Productivity. Sandiego Source the Daily Transcript. Mathis, R.L. Jackson, J. H., 2007, Human Resource Management, II edition. Thomson, South West. Sutherland 1. Canwell D., 2004, Key Concepts in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, United States. Nowier, M, 2009, Workplace environment and Its Impact on Employee Performance. Leadership Organization Development Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5 12. Yule, S., Flin, R. Murdy, A, 2007, The Role of Management and Safety Climate in Preventing Risk-Taking at Work : International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, vol. 7, No.2, pp. 137 - 151. Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M., Flin, R, 2003, Safety Climate, Safety Management Practice and Safety Performance in Offshore Environments: Safety Science, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 641-680. Lin, J. Mills,A, 2001, Measuring the Occupational Health and Safety Performance of Construction Companies in Australia: Facilities, vol. 19, no. 3/4, pp. l31 - l38.